Austria · Registers and office
The Austrian beneficial owner register (WiEReG)
who files, what is reported, and who may look
Last updated 17 September 2026. Every figure here carries its paragraph, its gazette reference and the date that version took effect.
The WiEReG, the Wirtschaftliche Eigentümer Registergesetz, created the Austrian register of beneficial owners: a central record of the natural persons who ultimately own or control a registered entity. Nearly every Austrian entity is inside its scope, the filing falls due four weeks after registration unless an exemption applies, the register is not public, and a filing that hides a beneficial owner is a fiscal offence carrying up to EUR 200,000.
Build note. With seventeen H2 sections the table of contents is mandatory. Generate it at build from the H2 headings below, as a real list of in-page anchors, with a stable
idon every H2. It is navigation, not copy.

What is the WiEReG, and what does the beneficial owner register hold?
Two Austrian registers answer questions about a company and are constantly confused. The Firmenbuch says who the company legally is, and anyone may read it: the company register guide covers it. The WiEReG register says who is behind it, and almost nobody may read it.
That distinction is the point of the act. A Firmenbuch entry names the registered shareholder, which may be a company in another country, a fiduciary holder or someone acting on instructions. The WiEReG register names the natural person at the end of the chain.
There is no public beneficial owner search in Austria. Inspection is granted by an extract bearing the register authority's Amtssignatur, and only to someone who proves a legitimate interest (WiEReG § 10, in force from 1 December 2025). The authority is the Federal Minister of Finance (§ 14 Abs. 1), Bundesanstalt Statistik Österreich runs it as processor, and filings arrive only through the Unternehmensserviceportal, the USP.
Firmenbuch or WiEReG: which register answers your question?
They answer different questions, and only one of them publishes.
The Firmenbuch answers "what is this company, and who may sign for it", and anyone may take an extract. The WiEReG register answers "which human being is behind it", and an extract needs a legitimate interest, an E-ID and a fee. A shareholder in one is not necessarily a beneficial owner in the other.
One clock starts the other.
The four-week WiEReG deadline runs from the first entry in the Stammregister, which for a company is the Firmenbuch (§ 5 Abs. 1). Register first, then file.
One feeds the other, and that is how most exemptions work.
Where an exemption applies, Statistik Austria takes the shareholders or directors already in the Firmenbuch over as beneficial owners and no filing is made at all (WiEReG § 6, in force from 1 October 2025).
Who has to file in the Austrian beneficial owner register?
§ 1 Abs. 2 lists nineteen categories of Rechtsträger, and the short answer is: if it is entered in the Firmenbuch, it is in scope. The categories worth reading twice sit at the bottom of the list, because they catch entities with no Austrian company at all.
| Group | Who is caught | Statutory reference |
|---|---|---|
| Companies and partnerships | offene Gesellschaft (OG), Kommanditgesellschaft (KG), Aktiengesellschaft (AG), Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung (GmbH), Flexible Kapitalgesellschaft (FlexCo) | § 1 Abs. 2 Z 1 to 4a |
| Cooperatives, mutuals and savings banks | Erwerbs- und Wirtschaftsgenossenschaften, Versicherungsvereine auf Gegenseitigkeit, kleine Versicherungsvereine, Sparkassen | § 1 Abs. 2 Z 5 to 8 |
| European legal forms | EWIV, Societas Europaea (SE), Europäische Genossenschaft (SCE) | § 1 Abs. 2 Z 9 to 11 |
| Foundations, funds and associations | Privatstiftungen under § 1 PSG, other entities registrable under FBG § 2 Z 13, Vereine, foundations and funds under BStFG 2015, and provincial foundations and funds where provincial law so provides | § 1 Abs. 2 Z 12 to 16 |
| Trusts | a trust administered from Austria; or, if administered outside Austria and the EEA, once the trustee enters a business relationship in Austria or undertakes to acquire Austrian land | § 1 Abs. 2 Z 17 |
| Trust-like arrangements | fiducie, fideicomiso and comparable arrangements, on the same triggers | § 1 Abs. 2 Z 18 |
| Reportable foreign entities | a company, foundation or comparable legal person seated outside Austria and outside the EEA that undertakes to acquire ownership of land in Austria. The duty continues for as long as the land is in its assets or it can exploit the land on its own account | § 1 Abs. 2 Z 19 |
WiEReG § 1 Abs. 2, version in force from 1 April 2024, BGBl. I Nr. 136/2017 as amended by BGBl. I Nr. 179/2023. A land purchase is an acquisition under § 1 Abs. 1 and 2 GrEStG 1987.
Who counts as a beneficial owner under Austrian law?
A beneficial owner is a natural person in whose ownership or under whose control the entity ultimately stands (WiEReG § 2, in force from 10 December 2024). Four tests, applied in order.
Direct. More than 25 percent of the shares, the voting rights or the participation, held by a natural person (§ 2 Z 1 lit. a sublit. aa).
Indirect. An entity holds more than 25 percent and a natural person controls it (sublit. bb). Holdings are added together where several entities sit under the same person's control, and a directly held stake is added to them.
Control. 50 percent of the shares plus one share, or more than 50 percent participation, or the UGB § 244 Abs. 2 criteria, or ultimate control in any other way. A Treugeber, the settlor of a fiduciary arrangement, has control through that relationship alone.
The fallback. Only where nobody can be identified after exhausting all possibilities, and there are no grounds for suspicion, do senior management count (lit. b).
Trusts and foundations are mapped by function: settlor, trustee, protector, the beneficiaries or their class, and anyone else in ultimate control (§ 2 Z 2 and Z 3). A class member receiving more than EUR 2,000 in a year is a beneficiary for that year.
The four tests, in order
- test 01
Direct
More than 25 percent of the shares, the voting rights or the participation, held by a natural person.
§ 2 Z 1 lit. a sublit. aa
- test 02
Indirect
An entity holds more than 25 percent and a natural person controls that entity.
§ 2 Z 1 lit. a sublit. bb
Holdings are added together where several entities sit under the same person's control, and a directly held stake is added to them.
- test 03
Control
50 percent of the shares plus one share, or more than 50 percent participation, or the UGB § 244 Abs. 2 criteria, or ultimate control in any other way. A Treugeber has control through the fiduciary relationship alone.
- test 04
The fallback: senior management
Only where nobody can be identified after exhausting all possibilities, and there are no grounds for suspicion.
§ 2 Z 1 lit. b
Specimen. Letters, not a real group. No company name, register number, Stammzahl or address appears here.
one ownership chain, read left to rightA
a natural person
B
an entity
D
the Austrian entity
B holds more than 25 percent of D, and A controls B. So A is an indirect beneficial owner of D (WiEReG § 2 Z 1 lit. a sublit. bb).
Which companies are exempt, and how does the exemption disappear?
Most small Austrian companies never file anything, by design: Statistik Austria takes the people already in the source register over as beneficial owners. The exemption is not a permanent status, though. It ends the moment either of two things is true, and the entity is expected to notice and file within four weeks.
| Entity | Exempt when | Who is taken over automatically |
|---|---|---|
| OG and KG (§ 6 Abs. 1) | all partners are natural persons | fewer than four partners registered: those partners. Four or more: the registered managing partners |
| GmbH (§ 6 Abs. 2) | all shareholders are natural persons | the registered shareholders holding more than 25 percent; where none does, the registered managing directors |
| FlexCo (§ 6 Abs. 2a) | all shareholders entered in the Firmenbuch are natural persons | those with voting rights of more than 25 percent, calculated under GmbHG § 39 Abs. 2 first sentence; where none, the registered managing directors |
| Cooperatives (§ 6 Abs. 3) | always | the registered board members, or, where managers are also registered, only the managers |
| Mutual insurance associations, small mutuals, savings banks (§ 6 Abs. 4) | always | the board members entered in the source register |
| Associations (§ 6 Abs. 5) | always | the organ representatives entered in the association register |
| All of them | the exemption ends if another natural person is a beneficial owner under § 2, or if a nominee arrangement under § 2a exists | a full filing under § 5 Abs. 1 is then due |
WiEReG § 6, version in force from 1 October 2025, BGBl. I Nr. 136/2017 as amended by BGBl. I Nr. 151/2024. The FlexCo rule turns on voting rights and on the shareholders actually entered in the Firmenbuch, which is a narrower set than a GmbH's.
What exactly has to be reported?
A filing is not a name and a percentage. § 5 Abs. 1 fixes four blocks of data, and the fourth only exists because of the nominee rules.
| Block | What is reported |
|---|---|
| Direct beneficial owners (Z 1) | name; the number and type of the official photo ID, where the person has no residence in Austria; date and place of birth; nationality; residence. Where a beneficial owner has died, that is stated |
| Indirect beneficial owners (Z 2) | the same personal data, plus the Stammzahl of the Austrian top-level entity and the holding at it; or, for a foreign top-level entity, its name, seat, legal form, register identifiers and the holding |
| The nature and extent of the interest (Z 3) | whether the interest is ownership, voting rights or control, with the percentage; and whether a nominee arrangement exists and whether the person is nominee, nominee director or nominator, trustee or settlor |
| Nominee arrangements (Z 3a and Z 3b) | that a relevant arrangement exists; its designation and its date; and, for every nominee, nominee director and nominator, the same personal data set as for a beneficial owner, or the Stammzahl where the nominee is itself an entity |
| Where a professional representative files (Z 4) | whether the representative established and verified the beneficial owners, whether a Compliance-Package is transmitted, and whether it is restricted |
WiEReG § 5 Abs. 1, version in force from 1 December 2025. For a beneficial owner with no Austrian residence, § 5 Abs. 2 requires the entity to upload a copy of that photo ID through the USP as well.
The deadlines: four weeks, counted four different ways
Four weeks from the first entry in the source register.
The clock starts at the first Stammregister entry, not when the entity works out who its beneficial owners are (§ 5 Abs. 1). For a company that is the day of the Firmenbuch entry.
Four weeks from an exemption ending.
The deadline companies miss, because nothing announces it: a share sold to a holding company, or a fiduciary agreement signed, and the clock is running.
Four weeks from knowledge of any change.
For the entity's own data already in the source register, knowledge is assumed from the date of that entry. Where a change takes effect before the register records it, the period runs from the day it took effect.
Four weeks after the annual review falls due.
An entity that is not exempt reports the changes it found or confirms the data already reported. A confirmation is a filing, and not making one is a failure to file.
The exception that saves a change filing.
Where an exemption applies, the duty to report a change lapses if the source-register entry is applied for within four weeks. Correct the Firmenbuch in time and the WiEReG follows.
Is your filing current?
If you are unsure whether your Austrian entity is exempt, whether an exemption ended when the shareholding changed, or whether the annual confirmation has ever been filed, send us the structure and we will tell you what the act requires of it.
The duty of diligence behind the filing
Understand the structure, do not just name a person.
The entity must establish its beneficial owner's identity and take adequate measures to verify it, including adequate measures to understand the ownership and control structure and to assess whether nominee arrangements, sub-foundations or function-holding entities exist (WiEReG § 3 Abs. 1, in force from 1 October 2025).
At least once a year, whether anything changed or not.
The duty runs at least annually, and the entity must check whether the registered beneficial owners are still current (§ 3 Abs. 3). It is the obligation behind step 4, and the one a company with a stable shareholder list is likeliest never to have performed.
Five years of paperwork.
The documents are kept at least five years after the end of that person's beneficial ownership (§ 3 Abs. 2). A complete Compliance-Package discharges the keeping duty.
What is a Compliance-Package, and who can file one?
A Compliance-Package is the evidence behind a filing, uploaded to the register rather than kept in a drawer. Only a berufsmäßiger Parteienvertreter, a professional party representative who has established and verified the beneficial owners, may transmit one (WiEReG § 5a, in force from 1 October 2025). It matters to a foreign group because it lets an Austrian bank see the chain above the Austrian company without asking for the same documents a fourth time.
- An organigram is compulsory for companies, partnerships, EEIGs and SEs (§ 5a Abs. 1 Z 1).
- The constitutional documents, by legal form: the partnership agreement, articles creating voting or control rights that differ from the shareholdings, the FlexCo's Anteilsbuch, a Privatstiftung's deed and its supplementary deed, a trust deed.
- Evidence and declarations about any fiduciary relationship and any nominee arrangement under § 2a.
- Freshness is fixed by statute. Foreign register extracts and the management's confirmation may not be older than six weeks at filing (§ 5a Abs. 4), and anything not in German or English needs a certified translation.
- The management signs for it, confirming the documents are complete and that no voting, control or fiduciary relationship diverges from the filing (§ 5a Abs. 5).
- It expires. Valid twelve months from the last filing that transmitted one, extended by twelve more on a change filing (§ 5a Abs. 6 and Abs. 7). The documents are deleted after five years.
Who is allowed to look, and what does an extract cost?
Four routes, and none of them is a search box. Which one is yours turns on whether you are an obliged entity under anti-money-laundering law, and whether you can prove a legitimate interest.
A legitimate interest is presumed for journalists, academics and civil-society organisations working against money laundering, terrorist financing or sanctions circumvention. It also exists, and this is the route most commercial readers need, where the applicant wishes to enter into a business relationship with the entity and the economic or personal elements of that relationship can ground a sufficient interest in the person of the beneficial owner (§ 10 Abs. 2). An approved applicant is emailed a link to pay and retrieve the extract, valid four weeks; a refusal is appealable to the Bundesverwaltungsgericht.
One sentence changes how an extract should be used: it may be used to identify a beneficial owner and not to verify one (§ 11 Abs. 1). An obliged entity may never rely on the register alone.
| Route | Who it is for | What the extract shows | Fee |
|---|---|---|---|
| Your own entity (§ 10 Abs. 5) | any entity, about its own data, through the USP | its own filing | see the rows below |
| Simple extract (§ 9 Abs. 4) | obliged entities: banks, notaries, lawyers, accountants and the rest of the § 9 Abs. 1 list | the entity's name, address, Stammzahl, source register, legal form and period of existence, ÖNACE code; each direct and indirect beneficial owner with name, date of birth, nationality, place of birth, residence and the nature of the interest; the nominee data; the date of the last filing and whether a § 6 exemption applies | EUR 4.00 |
| Extended extract (§ 9 Abs. 5) | the same | everything above, plus a machine-generated representation of every known participation level, capped at 20 levels, the entity's representatives, a statement of whether it is a complete extended extract, and the express note that no warranty is given for accuracy | EUR 5.00 |
| Extended extract with a Compliance-Package (§ 9 Abs. 5a) | the same | the above plus the uploaded documents. Where the package is restricted, release is requested through the USP; the entity or its representative may release it within two weeks, for four weeks, and no answer within two weeks is an automatic refusal | EUR 10.00 |
| Legitimate-interest extract (§ 10) | anyone who proves a legitimate interest, identified by E-ID; a written application is open to citizens of states without an E-ID scheme | the entity's identifying data, the direct and indirect beneficial owners with country of residence, the nature of the interest, and the nominee information | EUR 4.00 |
| Through a professional representative (§ 9 Abs. 2a) | a client with the business-relationship interest, whose representative queries for them; also insolvency administrators and notaries acting as court commissioners | as for the § 10 extract | EUR 4.00 plus the representative's own terms |
| Annual contingent (ordinance § 2) | obliged entities querying at volume | 15 queries EUR 75; 50 queries EUR 220; 250 queries EUR 1,050; 750 queries EUR 3,000; 2,500 queries EUR 9,500; 7,500 queries EUR 27,000. One query is one simple or extended extract; an extended extract with a Compliance-Package costs two | as listed |
Fees under the WiEReG-Nutzungsentgelteverordnung, § 1, in force from 1 October 2024, BGBl. II Nr. 77/2018 as amended by BGBl. II Nr. 229/2024. The contingents are § 2 of the same ordinance; the power to set them is § 17 Abs. 1 WiEReG.

Four routes to an extract, and one that does not exist
- route 01
Your own entity
§ 10 Abs. 5through the USPAny entity, about its own data: what it has itself filed.
- route 02
Obliged entity
EUR 4.00simple extract, § 9 Abs. 4 EUR 5.00extended extract, § 9 Abs. 5Banks, notaries, lawyers, accountants and the rest of the § 9 Abs. 1 list.
branchEUR 10.00§ 9 Abs. 5awhere a Compliance-Package is opened.
- route 03
Legitimate interest
EUR 4.00§ 10 Abs. 2Two ways in:
entry apresumed for journalists, academics and civil-society organisations working against money laundering, terrorist financing or sanctions circumvention
entry bthe applicant wishes to enter into a business relationship, and its economic or personal elements ground a sufficient interest
- route 04
Through a professional party representative
EUR 4.00§ 9 Abs. 2aOn behalf of a client, plus the representative's own terms. Also insolvency administrators and notaries acting as court commissioners.
Public search: does not exist
Said in words and not in colour: the register is not open to the general public. Inspection needs one of the four routes above, and an extract may be used to identify a beneficial owner, never to verify one (§ 11 Abs. 1).
Fees under the WiEReG-Nutzungsentgelteverordnung, as in the table above.
Can a beneficial owner keep their name out of the extract?
Sometimes, and the bar is high. A beneficial owner may apply in writing for inspection to be restricted, naming the entities it should cover; the extract then shows a note in place of the data (WiEReG § 10a, in force from 10 December 2024).
The test is a disproportionate risk of becoming the victim of a listed offence: fraud (StGB §§ 146 to 148), kidnapping for ransom or extortion (§§ 102, 144 and 145), an offence against life or limb (§§ 75, 76 and 83 to 87), or coercion, dangerous threat or stalking (§§ 105 to 107a). The risk must be markedly higher than for an average beneficial owner in a comparable position, typically because offences have already been committed or threatened against the person or a close relative. Minors and persons lacking legal capacity always qualify.
Two sentences in the same paragraph decide most applications. The first: the mere fact that beneficial ownership becomes known is in general not a disproportionate danger. The second: there is no protectable interest where the data already appear in other public registers. For an Austrian GmbH shareholder, whose name and date of birth are a Firmenbuch entry, the second is usually the end of it.
Applied before a filing, inspection can be suspended for at most 14 days, and the authority decides within 14 days unless the application is manifestly unfounded (§ 10a Abs. 3).
What it costs to get this wrong
The penalties are set out exactly as the statute sets them out, with nothing added. All of them are Finanzvergehen or Finanzordnungswidrigkeiten, and none is ever tried by a court (§ 15 Abs. 7): they are decided by the tax-penal authority under the Finanzstrafgesetz, and the register authority must report a reasonable suspicion to it.
| Conduct | Intentional | Grossly negligent | Provision |
|---|---|---|---|
| An incorrect or incomplete filing that thereby fails to disclose beneficial owners, nominees, nominee directors or nominators | EUR 200,000 | EUR 100,000 | § 15 Abs. 1 Z 1 |
| The same, failing to disclose entities holding a function or sub-foundations | EUR 200,000 | EUR 100,000 | § 15 Abs. 1 Z 1a |
| Not filing despite two requests | EUR 200,000 | EUR 100,000 | § 15 Abs. 1 Z 2 |
| No, or a defective, filing on the lapse of an exemption, or before a notarial deed for Austrian land | EUR 200,000 | EUR 100,000 | § 15 Abs. 1 Z 3 |
| Changes not filed within four weeks of knowledge | EUR 200,000 | EUR 100,000 | § 15 Abs. 1 Z 4 and Z 4a |
| A trustee not disclosing that status; a reportable foreign entity not disclosing its status | EUR 200,000 | EUR 100,000 | § 15 Abs. 1 Z 5 and Z 6 |
| A nominee or nominee director not disclosing that status under § 4a | EUR 200,000 | EUR 100,000 | § 15 Abs. 1 Z 7 |
| Not keeping the five-year records | EUR 75,000 | EUR 25,000 | § 15 Abs. 2 |
| Breaching the due-diligence duties, including the annual review | EUR 75,000 | EUR 25,000 | § 15 Abs. 2a |
| Transmitting false or falsified documents with a Compliance-Package | EUR 75,000 | not applicable | § 15 Abs. 3 |
| An incorrect, incomplete or late filing not reaching Abs. 1 or Abs. 3 | EUR 25,000 | not applicable | § 15 Abs. 4 |
| Not transmitting required Compliance-Package documents, or other § 5a breaches | EUR 10,000 | not applicable | § 15 Abs. 5 |
| Passing restricted data, or an extract containing it, to a third party | EUR 50,000 | not applicable | § 15 Abs. 6 |
| Retrieving a § 10 extract without a legitimate interest | EUR 25,000 | not applicable | § 15 Abs. 6a |
Separately, there is the machinery that makes a filing happen. Where no filing is made at all, Finanzamt Österreich may compel one by coercive penalty under BAO § 111, after a warning setting a six-week period (§ 16 Abs. 1). A single coercive penalty may not exceed EUR 5,000, and no separate appeal lies against the warning (BAO § 111 Abs. 3 and Abs. 4, BGBl. Nr. 194/1961 as amended by BGBl. I Nr. 97/2025, version in force from 1 January 2027). It is treated as a tax and collected like one.
The register authority looks rather than waits. It risk-scores filings automatically, samples them, and monitors the discrepancy notes obliged entities set: an entity that does not replace such a note with a new filing within six weeks is sampled (§ 14 Abs. 3). It may demand documents at any time and enforce its orders with a ceiling of EUR 30,000 against a legal person and EUR 15,000 against a natural person (§ 14 Abs. 4 and 5).
WiEReG § 15, version in force from 1 October 2025, BGBl. I Nr. 136/2017 as amended by BGBl. I Nr. 151/2024. The amounts are statutory maxima, not tariffs.

The nominee rules, and the four dates they arrived on
The newest part of the act arrived on four dates rather than one, all of it enacted by BGBl. I Nr. 151/2024 and each date set out in § 19 Abs. 11: the definitions in § 2a and the nominee's own disclosure duty in § 4a from 1 January 2025 (Z 1); the closing part of § 5 Abs. 1 Z 1 and § 7 Abs. 2 from 3 June 2025 (Z 2); the diligence duty in § 3 Abs. 1, the nominee fields in the filing itself, § 5 Abs. 1 Z 3a and Z 3b, the exemption rule, supervision and the penalties in § 15 from 1 October 2025 (Z 3), with Z 3b applying to filings transmitted after 30 September 2025; and § 5 Abs. 1 Z 3c with the two access provisions from 1 December 2025 (Z 4). The December date is often quoted for the nominee filing and that is wrong: Z 3c is about function-holding entities and Substiftungen. The consolidated § 5 document is the December version, which is how the mistake travels. What the arrangement is, and what it lawfully may be, belongs to what a nominee director may lawfully do in Austria, and what a nominee owes personally develops the duty itself.
1. The definitions are deliberately wide. A Nominator instructs; a Nominee acts as owner or in a function for them; a Nominee-Direktor routinely manages in their own name on the nominator's instructions. A Nominee-Vereinbarung is any formal or informal arrangement under which a nominee undertakes to act for the nominator (WiEReG § 2a, in force from 1 January 2025). In a Treuhand the trustee is the nominee and the settlor the nominator.
2. Being a nominee is not the same as being a beneficial owner. The act says so expressly (§ 2a Abs. 2). The arrangement is reported because it is an arrangement, not because it makes anyone an owner.
3. It is the fastest way to lose an exemption. A GmbH whose shareholders are all natural persons files nothing. Sign one fiduciary agreement over one share and the exemption is gone, a full filing is due, and it must carry the agreement's designation and date and full personal data for everyone involved (§ 6 Abs. 2 and § 5 Abs. 1 Z 3b). A nominee who does not disclose their own status commits the offence in § 15 Abs. 1 Z 7.
What this means if you are not resident in Austria
- Your passport goes into the filing and a copy goes with it, and your address in the register is your residence, wherever that is (§ 5 Abs. 1 Z 1 lit. b and § 5 Abs. 2). The registered seat is a different question: the virtual office guide covers the seat and the address for service.
- A foreign parent does not stay out of it. A foreign top-level entity is reported with its name, seat, legal form and register identifiers (§ 5 Abs. 1 Z 2).
- Buying Austrian property can pull a foreign company in on its own, with no Austrian subsidiary at all, if it is seated outside the EEA (§ 1 Abs. 2 Z 19). A notary checks the filing was made before recording the deed.
- Looking someone up from abroad needs an E-ID or a letter. A citizen of a state without an E-ID scheme may apply in writing (§ 10 Abs. 3), and an Austrian party representative may query for you where you have the business-relationship interest (§ 9 Abs. 2a).
- The annual confirmation is the duty foreign owners miss. Nothing arrives to remind you and the shareholding has not changed, and it is still due four weeks after the review falls due.
Sources: the official routes
Everything above was read from the statute itself on 17 September 2026, through the Federal Chancellery's open-data service.
- The act, paragraph by paragraph, as RIS open data: each provision above links to its own document.
- The register authority's own English overview: bmf.gv.at, The Register of Beneficial Owners, with its companion pages Reports to the Register and Inspection of the Beneficial Owner Register.
- The filing channel, the Unternehmensserviceportal service page. Named and not linked: the portal answers the English URL for this service with an untranslated page, checked 17 September 2026.
- The fee ordinance, WiEReG-Nutzungsentgelteverordnung, BGBl. II Nr. 77/2018, linked at the fee table.
- Not used: the unofficial English translation of the act, which is not the operative text. Every English rendering of a provision here is ours, made from the German.
Where a figure is not published officially this page says so rather than estimating: no processing times beyond the periods the act fixes, no count of entities registered or in default, and no advice on whether a particular structure creates a beneficial owner.
Frequently asked questions
What is the WiEReG, and what does the Austrian beneficial owner register contain?
WiEReG is the Wirtschaftliche Eigentümer Registergesetz, and the register it created holds the natural persons who ultimately own or control an Austrian entity. An extract shows each beneficial owner by name, date and place of birth, nationality, residence and the nature of the interest, together with any nominee arrangement (WiEReG § 9 Abs. 4).
Who counts as a beneficial owner of an Austrian company?
Any natural person holding more than 25 percent of the shares, the voting rights or the participation, directly or through entities they control, and anyone controlling the company in another way. Control is 50 percent of shares plus one share, or more than 50 percent. Only where nobody qualifies do senior management count (WiEReG § 2).
What is the difference between a registered shareholder and a beneficial owner in Austria?
A registered shareholder is whoever the Firmenbuch names as holding the shares. A beneficial owner is the natural person behind that holding. They are often the same person and often not: a corporate shareholder, a fiduciary arrangement or a nominee agreement separates them, and only the second is reported to the WiEReG register.
Does my Austrian GmbH have to file in the beneficial owner register?
Not while every shareholder is a natural person. Statistik Austria then takes the registered shareholders holding more than 25 percent over automatically, or the registered managing directors where none does (WiEReG § 6 Abs. 2). The exemption ends the moment another natural person is the beneficial owner or a nominee arrangement exists.
What is the deadline for the Austrian beneficial owner filing?
Four weeks, counted four ways: from the first entry in the source register, from an exemption ending, from knowledge of any change, and from the due date of the annual review, when the changes found must be filed or the existing data confirmed (WiEReG § 5 Abs. 1). A confirmation is itself a filing.
How do I file beneficial owners in Austria, and who can do it for me?
Only electronically, through the Unternehmensserviceportal, to Bundesanstalt Statistik Österreich as processor for the register authority. A professional party representative may transmit it for you (WiEReG § 5 Abs. 2). For a beneficial owner with no Austrian residence you must upload a copy of their official photo identity document as well.
Is the Austrian beneficial owner register public, and can I search it?
No, and there is no public search box. Inspection is by an extract carrying the register authority's Amtssignatur, and only for someone who proves a legitimate interest (WiEReG § 10 Abs. 1). Journalists, academics and qualifying civil-society organisations are presumed to have one, as is someone planning a business relationship with the entity.
How much does it cost to look at the Austrian beneficial owner register?
The ordinance fixes it: EUR 4.00 for a simple extract or an extract on legitimate interest, EUR 5.00 for an extended extract and EUR 10.00 for an extended extract opening a Compliance-Package (WiEReG-Nutzungsentgelteverordnung § 1). Obliged entities can buy annual contingents instead, EUR 75 for 15 queries up to EUR 27,000 for 7,500.
What are the penalties for not filing beneficial owners in Austria?
Filing in a way that fails to disclose a beneficial owner, or filing a change late, is a fiscal offence punishable by up to EUR 200,000 intentionally and EUR 100,000 grossly negligently (WiEReG § 15 Abs. 1). Separately, Finanzamt Österreich can compel the filing by coercive penalty, capped at EUR 5,000 each time after a six-week warning.
Does a nominee or trustee arrangement have to be reported in Austria?
Yes. The filing must state that an arrangement exists, its designation and its date, and full personal data for every nominee, nominee director and nominator (WiEReG § 5 Abs. 1 Z 3b). Being a nominee or a nominee director does not by itself make a person a beneficial owner (§ 2a Abs. 2).
Can a beneficial owner have their name hidden in the Austrian register?
Only on a written application proving a disproportionate risk of becoming the victim of fraud, kidnapping, extortion, an offence against life or limb, coercion or stalking (WiEReG § 10a). Minors always qualify. The statute adds that the mere fact that beneficial ownership becomes known is in general not a disproportionate danger.
What is a Compliance-Package in the Austrian beneficial owner register?
Documentation that a professional party representative uploads through the Unternehmensserviceportal to show how the beneficial owners were established: an organigram, the constitutional documents, and evidence of any fiduciary or nominee arrangement (WiEReG § 5a). It is valid for twelve months, and foreign register extracts inside it may not be older than six weeks.
Does a foreign company have to file in the Austrian beneficial owner register?
If it is seated outside Austria and outside the EEA and undertakes to acquire ownership of land in Austria, yes, and the duty runs while the land is in its assets (WiEReG § 1 Abs. 2 Z 19). A notary must satisfy himself the filing was made before recording the deed (§ 11 Abs. 1).
Related services
The register that is public, and how to read it. The Firmenbuch names the registered shareholder, not the person behind them: the company register guide.
The arrangement this register now reports. Before you sign anything fiduciary, read what a nominee director may lawfully do in Austria.